I stick to the marxist notion to a state, which is a repressive apparatus in the hands of the ruling class.
Ultimately we should aim towards a stateless society, which at the same time should be classless.
Of course there are some social welfare features that a limited number of states include.
But it is not an inherent part of a state as experience shows. Remove social welfare and the state still persists in its distilled form of bureaucratic and violent control of common people. By means of repressive legislation, police, army.
State is a product of choices by the people. Its existance does not equal tp the existence of governabilitty. Tje conditions of state and governability do not imply their nature, i.e. authoritarian or democratic. The existence of state is to preserve the state itself, and its masters, not to serve the people as you speak unless they are the masters themselves.
I stick to the marxist notion to a state, which is a repressive apparatus in the hands of the ruling class.
Ultimately we should aim towards a stateless society, which at the same time should be classless.
Of course there are some social welfare features that a limited number of states include.
But it is not an inherent part of a state as experience shows. Remove social welfare and the state still persists in its distilled form of bureaucratic and violent control of common people. By means of repressive legislation, police, army.
State is a product of choices by the people. Its existance does not equal tp the existence of governabilitty. Tje conditions of state and governability do not imply their nature, i.e. authoritarian or democratic. The existence of state is to preserve the state itself, and its masters, not to serve the people as you speak unless they are the masters themselves.